Home
Back
Percentage Agreement Formula:
| From: | To: |
Percentage Agreement (PA) is a statistical measure used to calculate the level of agreement between two or more raters or observers. It represents the proportion of items where all raters agree, expressed as a percentage of the total items being rated.
The calculator uses the Percentage Agreement formula:
Where:
Explanation: The formula calculates the simple proportion of agreements to total items and converts it to a percentage by multiplying by 100.
Details: Percentage Agreement is widely used in research, quality control, and inter-rater reliability studies. It provides a straightforward measure of consensus among observers, though it doesn't account for chance agreement like more sophisticated measures such as Cohen's Kappa.
Tips: Enter the number of agreements (items where all raters concur) and the total number of items rated. Ensure agreements ≤ total items and both values are non-negative integers.
Q1: What is considered a good percentage agreement?
A: Generally, ≥80% is considered good agreement, though this varies by field. Higher percentages indicate stronger consensus among raters.
Q2: How does percentage agreement differ from Cohen's Kappa?
A: Percentage Agreement doesn't account for chance agreement, while Cohen's Kappa adjusts for the probability of chance agreement, providing a more robust measure of inter-rater reliability.
Q3: When should I use percentage agreement?
A: Use Percentage Agreement for quick, simple assessments of agreement. For more rigorous reliability analysis, especially when chance agreement is likely, use Cohen's Kappa or other statistical measures.
Q4: Can percentage agreement be used with more than two raters?
A: Yes, Percentage Agreement can be used with multiple raters by counting items where all raters agree on the classification or rating.
Q5: What are the limitations of percentage agreement?
A: The main limitation is that it doesn't consider chance agreement, which can inflate agreement scores, particularly when categories are imbalanced or raters have systematic biases.